Boyle v. Dolan

120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 253
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 21, 1929·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment for the defendant upon demurrer sustained to a declaration which alleges that the defendant invited the plaintiff to drive with him in his automobile; that plaintiff occepted the invitation; that defendant driving said automobile at a reckless and careless and dangerous rate of speed over plaintiff’s repeated objections and request to drive at a careful and prudent rate of speed, negligently and carelessly lost control of said automobile, and negligently and carelessly collided with another automobile. “Because of defendant’s recklessness, carelessness and negligence in the aforesaid collision,” plaintiff was injured, etc. The above and other pertinent allegations do not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer to the declaration should have been overruled. See Carlton v. F. E. C. Ry. Co., 95 Fla., 596, 116 So. R. 870; Yon v. Pinellas County *254 Power Co., 93 Fla. 503, 112 So. R. 50, and authorities cited.

Where a declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, a demurrer thereto should not be sustained.

The judgment on demurrer sustained is reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyle v. Dolan, 120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 253 (Fla. 1929).

120 So. 334 (Boyle v. Dolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutig v. Lake Jem Land Co.
20 So. 2d 497 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Rodriguez v. Powell
172 So. 849 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Depfer v. Walker
169 So. 660 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Jenkins v. the City Ice and Fuel Co.
160 So. 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Greene v. Miller Et Ux.
136 So. 532 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)