Boone v. Gay

94 So. 501, 84 Fla. 589
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 20, 1922·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal was taken from an order sustaining a demurrer to a bill of complaint. As the allegations of the bill of complaint afford a sufficient predicate for substantial relief if sustained by appropriate and sufficient evidence, the demurrer to the whole bill should have been overruled. Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498, 86 South. [590]*590Rep. 336; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329, 86 South. Rep. 208. See also Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Catts v. Henderson, 81 Fla. 138, 87 South. Rep. 313; Jaudon v. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co., 81 Fla. 313, 87 South. Rep. 313.

Reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boone v. Gay, 94 So. 501, 84 Fla. 589 (Fla. 1922).

94 So. 501 (Boone v. Gay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Kibben
132 So. 194 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Clapp v. Coral Gables Corp.
125 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Walker v. Close
126 So. 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Warrington v. Williams
111 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)