Wells v. Williams

86 So. 336, 80 Fla. 498
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 8, 1920·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An amended bill of complaint filed herein seeks to ha-ve-a trust decreed in real estate and partition thereof ■ made.- A -general demurrer to the [499] amended bill of complaint was sustained and by the order the bill stood dismissed upon failure of complainant to amend within the stated time. Complainants appealed. Without stating .the numerous allegations or discussing the law applicable to the points made by the demurrer, it is sufficient to say that under the allegations an equity for substantial relief may be shown by appropriate and sufficient evidence; therefore, the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been overruled. See Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, 79 Fla. 539, 86 South. Rep. 208.

Reversed for further proceedings.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. Williams, 86 So. 336, 80 Fla. 498 (Fla. 1920).

86 So. 336 (Wells v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Kibben
132 So. 194 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Clapp v. Coral Gables Corp.
125 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Hall v. Lewis
114 So. 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Warrington v. Williams
111 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Bjoraas v. South Florida Co.
92 Fla. 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Munson v. Munson
106 So. 414 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
106 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Leavine v. Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'n
102 So. 768 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Boone v. Gay
94 So. 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Dinkins v. Whiteside
92 So. 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)