Dinkins v. Whiteside

92 So. 688, 84 Fla. 81
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 So. 688 (Dinkins v. Whiteside) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dinkins v. Whiteside, 92 So. 688, 84 Fla. 81 (Fla. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam

An amended bill of complaint herein brought to have a judgment canceled and to enjoin its enforcement on the ground, among others, that the debt, for which the judgment was rendered had been paid, was held insufficient on a general demurrer, and complainant appealed.

[82]*82As the allegations of the bill of complaint that are admitted by the demurrer do ,not wholly fail to state a case for equitable relief the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498, 86 South. Rep. 336; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329, 86 South. Rep. 208.

Reversed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howarth, Et Ux. v. City of Deland
158 So. 294 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Oakland Properties Corp. v. Hogan
117 So. 850 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 688, 84 Fla. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dinkins-v-whiteside-fla-1922.