Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. City of Miami
86 So. 208, 80 Fla. 329
Opinion
Proceedings brought to enjoin the enforcement of special assessments for a storm sewer were dismissed on demurrer. As the allegations of the bill of complaint are a sufficient basis for evidence upon the fundamental question of whether complainant’s specified property is or could be at all benefited by the construction of the storm sewer, the bill is not without equity and should not have been dismissed on demurrer.
Reversed for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. City of Miami, 86 So. 208, 80 Fla. 329 (Fla. 1920).
86 So. 208 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clapp v. Coral Gables Corp.
125 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Oakland Properties Corp. v. Hogan
117 So. 850 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Warrington v. Williams
111 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Munson v. Munson
106 So. 414 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
106 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Boone v. Gay
94 So. 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Dinkins v. Whiteside
92 So. 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co.
90 So. 621 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Wells v. Williams
86 So. 336 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)