Munson v. Munson

106 So. 414, 90 Fla. 553
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 414 (Munson v. Munson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munson v. Munson, 106 So. 414, 90 Fla. 553 (Fla. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant brought suit to set aside and annul a decree of divorce on the grounds of fraud and for temporary support and suit money. Demurrer to the bill was sustained and appeal was taken from that order. Without stating the numerous allegations of fraud or discussing the law applicable to the points made by the demurrer it is sufficient to say that on the showing made an equity for substantial relief may be shown by appropriate and sufficient evidence.

We do not think therefore the bill of complaint wholly fails to state a cause of action so the demurrer was erroneously sustained. Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 So. 270; Florida East Coast Ry. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329, 86 So. 208; Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498, 86 So. 336.

*554 Reversed for further proceedings.

West, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co.
83 So. 270 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. City of Miami
86 So. 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Wells v. Williams
86 So. 336 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 414, 90 Fla. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munson-v-munson-fla-1925.