United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
313 U.S. 543
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 28, 1941
DocketNo. 535
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 313 U.S. 543 (United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, 313 U.S. 543 (1941).
Opinion
It is ordered that the opinion filed March 31, 1941, be amended by inserting in the first paragraph on page 6, after the word “question,” the following: “not only are above ordinary high water mark but also claim that they”.
Opinion reported as amended, 312 U. S. 592.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seiler v. City of Norwalk
949 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Mildenberger v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 217 (Federal Claims, 2010)
Lawrence Township Board of Trustees v. City of Canal Fulton
923 N.E.2d 1180 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Yamagiwa v. City of Half Moon Bay
523 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Lewis
355 F. Supp. 1132 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
United States v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc.
331 F. Supp. 151 (S.D. Florida, 1971)
United States v. Louis M. Ray
423 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Ray
423 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United States
401 F.2d 896 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Twin City Power Company and William P. Dauchy, Its Mortgagee, United States of America v. Twin City Power Company and William P. Dauchy, Its Mortgagee, United States of America v. Twin City Power Company and William P. Dauchy, Its Mortgagee
215 F.2d 592 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Twin City Power Co.
215 F.2d 592 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
Cross v. Pace
106 F. Supp. 484 (District of Columbia, 1952)
Hurley v. American Enka Corp.
93 F. Supp. 98 (E.D. Tennessee, 1950)
Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
59 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Rank v. Krug
90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. California, 1950)
United States v. Martin
177 F.2d 733 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Burkhardt v. United States
84 F. Supp. 553 (Court of Claims, 1949)
In Re Veterans' Air Express Co.
76 F. Supp. 684 (D. New Jersey, 1948)
Atkinson v. United States
68 F. Supp. 99 (D. Minnesota, 1946)
United States v. Dickinson
152 F.2d 865 (Fourth Circuit, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
313 U.S. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-pacific-railroad-scotus-1941.