United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

313 U.S. 543
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 1941·No. No. 535·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinion

It is ordered that the opinion filed March 31, 1941, be amended by inserting in the first paragraph on page 6, after the word “question,” the following: “not only are above ordinary high water mark but also claim that they”.

Opinion reported as amended, 312 U. S. 592.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, 313 U.S. 543 (1941).

313 U.S. 543 (United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seiler v. City of Norwalk
949 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Mildenberger v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 217 (Federal Claims, 2010)
Lawrence Township Board of Trustees v. City of Canal Fulton
923 N.E.2d 1180 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Yamagiwa v. City of Half Moon Bay
523 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Lewis
355 F. Supp. 1132 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
United States v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc.
331 F. Supp. 151 (S.D. Florida, 1971)
United States v. Louis M. Ray
423 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Ray
423 F.2d 16 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Twin City Power Co.
215 F.2d 592 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
Cross v. Pace
106 F. Supp. 484 (District of Columbia, 1952)
Hurley v. American Enka Corp.
93 F. Supp. 98 (E.D. Tennessee, 1950)
Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
59 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Rank v. Krug
90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. California, 1950)
United States v. Martin
177 F.2d 733 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Burkhardt v. United States
84 F. Supp. 553 (Court of Claims, 1949)
In Re Veterans' Air Express Co.
76 F. Supp. 684 (D. New Jersey, 1948)
Atkinson v. United States
68 F. Supp. 99 (D. Minnesota, 1946)
United States v. Dickinson
152 F.2d 865 (Fourth Circuit, 1946)