State ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner
This text of 894 N.E.2d 325 (State ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. Upon consideration of the motions for admission of pro have vice of Neil Bradley, Daniel P. Tokaji, Brenda Wright, Jon Greenbaum, Bob Kengle, Jennifer R. Scullion, and Matthew [1465]*1465Morris on behalf of IMatters et al., and of Stephen P. Berzon, Stacey Layton, Barbara J. Chisholm, and Peter E. Leekman on behalf of the Ohio American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations and District 1199, Health Care and Social Service Union, Service Employees International Union,
It is ordered by the court that the motions are granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
894 N.E.2d 325, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-colvin-v-brunner-ohio-2008.