State ex rel. Herman v. Klopfleisch
This text of 646 N.E.2d 180 (State ex rel. Herman v. Klopfleisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Quo Warranto. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of quo warranto. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective February 27,1995, thaUan alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before March 20, 1995, unless, upon good cause shown, the time is extended by the court; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file his brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
646 N.E.2d 180, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-herman-v-klopfleisch-ohio-1995.