State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft

583 N.E.2d 965, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3732

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1992

Docket92- 16

StatusPublished

This text of 583 N.E.2d 965 (State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft, 583 N.E.2d 965, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3732 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint and an amended complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the complaint for writ of prohibition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby, granted to the extent that the parties are ordered to comply with the following briefing schedule:

On or before January 29, 1992, parties shall file with the Clerk of this court all evidence which they intend to present; on or before February 5,1992, relators shall file their merit brief(s); on or before February 12, 1992, respondents shall file their merit brief(s); and on or before February 18, 1992, relators shall file any reply brief(s).

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint and an amended complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the complaint for writ of prohibition be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby, granted to the extent that the parties are ordered to comply with the following briefing schedule:

On or before January 29, 1992, parties shall file with the Clerk of this court all evidence which they intend to present; on or before February 5,1992, relators shall file their merit brief(s); on or before February 12, 1992, respondents shall file their merit brief(s); and on or before February 18, 1992, relators shall file any reply brief(s).

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 N.E.2d 965, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1493, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hodges-v-taft-ohio-1992.