State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey

100 So. 796, 87 Fla. 55
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 28, 1924·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Browne are of opinion that the interlocutory order herein overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice West and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the interlocutory order should be reversed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the order should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452, and Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380.

An order will be entered affirming the interlocutory order to which the appeal herein was taken.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 100 So. 796, 87 Fla. 55 (Fla. 1924).

100 So. 796 (State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church
122 So. 274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Butler v. Jones
118 So. 684 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Jackson v. State
113 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Cravatt v. Pierson
113 So. 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson
112 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Broaddus v. Theurer
111 So. 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Redding v. Bank of Greenville
109 So. 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Dale v. Jennings
107 So. 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Yarnell v. Gregory
101 So. 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)