National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church

122 So. 274, 97 Fla. 857
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the decree appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that said decree should be *858 reversed, and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree will be affirmed upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 So. R. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 So. R. 380, and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 So. R. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, 101 So. R. 37; Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. 1107, 111 So. R. 110; Cravatt v. Pierson, 93 Fla. 935, 113 So. R. 94.

Decree affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church, 122 So. 274, 97 Fla. 857 (Fla. 1929).

122 So. 274 (National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cravatt v. Pierson
113 So. 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Broaddus v. Theurer
111 So. 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys
61 Fla. 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Quigg v. Radel
97 So. 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)
State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey
100 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Yarnell v. Gregory
101 So. 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)