Broaddus v. Theurer

111 So. 110, 92 Fla. 1107
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 111 So. 110 (Broaddus v. Theurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broaddus v. Theurer, 111 So. 110, 92 Fla. 1107 (Fla. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos, v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91.

An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. Food Fair Stores, North Dade, Inc.
155 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church
122 So. 274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Butler v. Jones
118 So. 684 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 110, 92 Fla. 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broaddus-v-theurer-fla-1926.