Butler v. Jones
This text of 118 So. 684 (Butler v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Strum are of opinion that the decree rendered by the trial court from which this appeal was taken should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Wi-iitfield, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of ^pinion that said judgment should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the decree will be affirmed on the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 So. R. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 So. R. 380; and State, ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 So. R. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, 101 S. R. *613 37; Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. 1107, 111 S. R. 110; Cravatt v. Pierson, 93 Fla. 935, 113 S. R. 94.
An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 So. 684, 96 Fla. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-jones-fla-1928.