Jackson v. State

113 So. 382, 93 Fla. 1044

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Justice Strum, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Whitfield are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court, to which the writ of error is addressed, should be reversed, while the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380; and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796; Yarness v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, — S. R. —; Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —, — S. R. - — ; Cravatt v. Pierson, —Fla. —, —S. R. —.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

All concur.