Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson

112 So. 891, 93 Fla. 934
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 112 So. 891 (Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson, 112 So. 891, 93 Fla. 934 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment entered by the trial court to which the writ of error herein addressed should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel, Ames v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796, Yarnell v. Gregory 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys
61 Fla. 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Quigg v. Radel
97 So. 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)
State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey
100 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Yarnell v. Gregory
101 So. 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 891, 93 Fla. 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-and-ellzey-v-wilkerson-fla-1927.