Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson
This text of 112 So. 891 (Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment entered by the trial court to which the writ of error herein addressed should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel, Ames v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796, Yarnell v. Gregory 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —.
An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 891, 93 Fla. 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johns-and-ellzey-v-wilkerson-fla-1927.