Redding v. Bank of Greenville

Supreme Court of Florida

Redding v. Bank of Greenville

109 So. 435, 92 Fla. 327, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 609

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 So. 435 (Redding v. Bank of Greenville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redding v. Bank of Greenville, 109 So. 435, 92 Fla. 327, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 609 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinions

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Strum are of opinion that the order appealed from should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the order should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the order should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224,37 South. Rep. 51; State ex rel. Amos v. Hamway, 87 Fla. 55,100 South. Rep. 796.

Affirmed.

All concur.

*Page 328

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Strum are of opinion that the order appealed from should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the order should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the order should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224,37 South. Rep. 51; State ex rel. Amos v. Hamway, 87 Fla. 55,100 South. Rep. 796.

Affirmed.

All concur.

*Page 328

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 435, 92 Fla. 327, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redding-v-bank-of-greenville-fla-1926.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack