Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
2 A.D.2d 882, 157 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3861
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 2 A.D.2d 882 (Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding, 2 A.D.2d 882, 157 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to direct defendant to answer questions put to him on an examination before trial or for alternative relief, unanimously affirmed. Concur — Peek, P. J., Botein, Rabin, Cox and Valente, JJ. [208 Misc. 846.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flushing National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance
135 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
State v. Carey Resources, Inc.
97 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
State v. Skibinski
87 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 882, 157 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southbridge-finishing-co-v-golding-nyappdiv-1956.