McCormack v. Holbrook

176 A.D. 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 A.D. 927 (McCormack v. Holbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCormack v. Holbrook, 176 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by a corporation not a party to the action, from an order of the Special Term that denies its motion to vacate an order directing that before trial the said corporation, “by Messrs. Birmingham and Russell, employed by the said company in its New York Branch * * * be examined and their depositions be taken pursuant to section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure.” The said motion included an application by the corporation for leave to intervene for the purposes of this motion. The order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. (Chartered Bank of India v. North River Ins. Co., 136 App. Div. 648.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, and without prejudice to any future application to examine Messrs. Birmingham and Russell, the persons named in the order as individuals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
2 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
In re Accounting of Kimelman
4 Misc. 2d 374 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormack-v-holbrook-nyappdiv-1917.