Weigand v. Schmitt

241 A.D. 655
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 241 A.D. 655 (Weigand v. Schmitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weigand v. Schmitt, 241 A.D. 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that there is a failure to show special circumstances such as to authorize the examination of a witness under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. We think in general the section in its provision for the examinartion of witnesses relates to the examination of individuals and not of corporations. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
2 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
In re Accounting of Kimelman
4 Misc. 2d 374 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
Tomford v. Bodnar Industries, Inc.
3 Misc. 2d 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Capone v. Beards Erie Basin, Inc.
3 Misc. 2d 490 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.
192 Misc. 19 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Gillette v. Warren
175 Misc. 614 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weigand-v-schmitt-nyappdiv-1934.