Weigand v. Schmitt
241 A.D. 655
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that there is a failure to show special circumstances such as to authorize the examination of a witness under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. We think in general the section in its provision for the examinartion of witnesses relates to the examination of individuals and not of corporations. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weigand v. Schmitt, 241 A.D. 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 655 (Weigand v. Schmitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding
2 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
In re Accounting of Kimelman
4 Misc. 2d 374 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
Tomford v. Bodnar Industries, Inc.
3 Misc. 2d 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Capone v. Beards Erie Basin, Inc.
3 Misc. 2d 490 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.
192 Misc. 19 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Gillette v. Warren
175 Misc. 614 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)