Smith v. State

285 S.W.3d 824, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 2009 WL 1758944
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2009·No. ED 91581·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lafair Smith appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 285 S.W.3d 824, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 2009 WL 1758944 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

285 S.W.3d 824 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Buford
285 S.W.3d 824 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)