Smith v. State

207 S.W.3d 135, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2006 WL 2669340
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. No. WD 65643·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Zachary Smith appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he raised claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and prosecutorial misconduct. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 207 S.W.3d 135, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2006 WL 2669340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

207 S.W.3d 135 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zachary Smith v. Mike Kemna
309 F. App'x 68 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)