Smith v. State

121 S.W.3d 259, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1848, 2003 WL 22774393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2030
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2003·No. No. ED 82727·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Smith appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Smith’s motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 121 S.W.3d 259, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1848, 2003 WL 22774393 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

121 S.W.3d 259 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.