Smith v. State
63 S.W.3d 680, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2334, 2001 WL 1643843
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Johnny Smith, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum for them information only setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 63 S.W.3d 680, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2334, 2001 WL 1643843 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
63 S.W.3d 680 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.