Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

988 S.W.2d 645, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 466

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 1999·No. No. 74935·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kawynn Smith, Movant, files this appeal challenging the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing following his guilty plea to second degree murder, section 565.021, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kawynn Smith, Movant, files this appeal challenging the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing following his guilty plea to second degree murder, section 565.021, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. State, 988 S.W.2d 645, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 466 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

988 S.W.2d 645 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.