Smith v. State

992 S.W.2d 254, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 496, 1999 WL 202865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 952
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1999·No. No. 74019·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Smith, Movant, pleaded guilty to first degree burglary in violation of section 569.160, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced Movant to eight years of imprisonment pursuant to his plea agreement with the State. Movant filed a motion for post-[255]*255conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035, which the motion court denied. Movant appeals.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 992 S.W.2d 254, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 496, 1999 WL 202865 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

992 S.W.2d 254 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.