Smith v. State
972 S.W.2d 521, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 1998 WL 240171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 952 →
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph H. Smith, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find that the motion court’s judgment is based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 972 S.W.2d 521, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 1998 WL 240171 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
972 S.W.2d 521 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.