Smith v. State

921 S.W.2d 69, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 93775
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1972
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1996·No. No. 68121·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying relief on his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 921 S.W.2d 69, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 93775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

921 S.W.2d 69 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.