Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

900 S.W.2d 237, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 998, 1995 WL 313057

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 1995·No. No. 67277·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wilbert K. Smith, appeals from a denial by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the [238]*238circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wilbert K. Smith, appeals from a denial by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the [238]*238circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. State, 900 S.W.2d 237, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 998, 1995 WL 313057 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

900 S.W.2d 237 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.