Smith v. State
848 S.W.2d 25, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1940, 1992 WL 385373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366 →
Opinion
[26]*26ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary-hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 848 S.W.2d 25, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1940, 1992 WL 385373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
848 S.W.2d 25 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.