Smith v. State
784 S.W.2d 910, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 304, 1990 WL 17804
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4773 →
Opinion
[911]*911ORDER
Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 784 S.W.2d 910, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 304, 1990 WL 17804 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
784 S.W.2d 910 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.