Smith v. State
892 S.W.2d 736, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1965, 1994 WL 705417
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 892 S.W.2d 736, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1965, 1994 WL 705417 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
892 S.W.2d 736 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.