Smith v. State

904 S.W.2d 474, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 1995 WL 392009
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1995·No. No. 67374·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Orlando Smith, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 904 S.W.2d 474, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 1995 WL 392009 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

904 S.W.2d 474 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.