Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

870 S.W.2d 255, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 1994 WL 41380

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1994·No. No. 64503·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Movant’s Rule 24.035 motion were not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Movant’s Rule 24.035 motion were not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Smith v. State, 870 S.W.2d 255, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 1994 WL 41380 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

870 S.W.2d 255 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.