Smith v. State
908 S.W.2d 188, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1765, 1995 WL 619874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 922 S.W.2d 29 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 908 S.W.2d 188, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1765, 1995 WL 619874 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
908 S.W.2d 188 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.