Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

921 S.W.2d 69, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 93775

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 5, 1996

DocketNo. 68121

StatusPublished

This text of 921 S.W.2d 69 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 921 S.W.2d 69, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 93775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying relief on his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying relief on his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 S.W.2d 69, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 1996 WL 93775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-moctapp-1996.