Smith v. State
961 S.W.2d 943, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 1998 WL 65779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 952 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 961 S.W.2d 943, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 1998 WL 65779 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
961 S.W.2d 943 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.