Smith v. State
16 S.W.3d 760, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2000 WL 558530
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 952 →
Opinion
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 16 S.W.3d 760, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2000 WL 558530 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
16 S.W.3d 760 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.