Smith v. State
78 S.W.3d 225, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1196, 2002 WL 1071431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488 →
Opinion
ORDER
Robert A. Smith appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The Court of Appeals found that trial counsel was not ineffective for failure to call certain witnesses, introduce certain evidence, timely endorse an alibi witness, or properly investigate his case. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 78 S.W.3d 225, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1196, 2002 WL 1071431 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).
78 S.W.3d 225 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.