Smith v. State

211 S.W.3d 165, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2007 WL 46040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 2007·No. ED 87602·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Movina Smith, appeals the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 211 S.W.3d 165, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2007 WL 46040 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

211 S.W.3d 165 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Castilleja
211 S.W.3d 165 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)