Smith v. State

202 S.W.3d 37, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2006 WL 2728647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 2006·No. ED 86845·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tyrone Smith (“Movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant was found guilty, following a jury trial, of one count of the class C felony of child molestation in the first degree, section 566.067, RSMo 1994, and one count of the class B felony of child molestation in the first degree, section 566.067, RSMo 2000. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to five years of imprisonment and ten years of imprison *38 ment respectively, with the sentences to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 202 S.W.3d 37, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2006 WL 2728647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

202 S.W.3d 37 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilberto Castillo v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston), 2026