Smith v. State

232 S.W.3d 730, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1349, 2007 WL 2702336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2007·No. ED 89144·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Abdullah Smith, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that there was not a factual basis for his guilty plea to drug trafficking in the second degree.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 232 S.W.3d 730, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1349, 2007 WL 2702336 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

232 S.W.3d 730 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.