Smith v. State

211 S.W.3d 165, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2007 WL 46040
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 2007
DocketED 87602
StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 165 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 211 S.W.3d 165, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2007 WL 46040 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Movina Smith, appeals the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Castilleja
211 S.W.3d 165 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W.3d 165, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2007 WL 46040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-moctapp-2007.