State v. Buford

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Buford

285 S.W.3d 824, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2009 WL 1758898

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 2009

DocketED 91940

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 285 S.W.3d 824 (State v. Buford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buford, 285 S.W.3d 824, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2009 WL 1758898 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Buford appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of felony second-degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo 2000, first-degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Buford appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of felony second-degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo 2000, first-degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.W.3d 824, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 880, 2009 WL 1758898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buford-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack