Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy
This text of 2016 NMSC 6 (Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon motion to clarify stay and response thereto, and the Court having considered said pleadings and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Barbara J. Vigil, Justice Petra Jimenez Maes, Justice Edward L. Chavez, Justice Charles W. Daniels, and Justice Judith K. Nakamura concurring;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to clarify the stay is GRANTED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 12-405(C) NMRA, the precedential value of the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy, 2015-NMCA-097, 356 P.3d 546, is hereby suspended until further order of this Court; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be scheduled for oral argument on the next available calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WITNESS, Honorable Barbara J. Vigil, Chief Justice Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, andthe seal of said Court this 15th day of February, 2016.
(SEAL)
Joey D. Moya, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 NMSC 6, 2016 NMSC 006, 9 N.M. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodriguez-v-brand-west-dairy-nm-2016.