Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy

2016 NMSC 6, 2016 NMSC 006, 9 N.M. 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.M. 241
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 2016·No. 35,426 35,438·Published

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon motion to clarify stay and response thereto, and the Court having considered said pleadings and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Barbara J. Vigil, Justice Petra Jimenez Maes, Justice Edward L. Chavez, Justice Charles W. Daniels, and Justice Judith K. Nakamura concurring;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to clarify the stay is GRANTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 12-405(C) NMRA, the precedential value of the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy, 2015-NMCA-097, 356 P.3d 546, is hereby suspended until further order of this Court; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be scheduled for oral argument on the next available calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS, Honorable Barbara J. Vigil, Chief Justice Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, andthe seal of said Court this 15th day of February, 2016.

(SEAL)

Joey D. Moya, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy, 2016 NMSC 6, 2016 NMSC 006, 9 N.M. 315 (N.M. 2016).

2016 NMSC 6 (Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Brand West Dairy
2015 NMCA 097 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2015)