Robinson v. State

295 S.W.3d 231, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1478, 2009 WL 3364370
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·No. ED 92094·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Robinson (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 295 S.W.3d 231, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1478, 2009 WL 3364370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

295 S.W.3d 231 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCottrell
295 S.W.3d 231 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)