Robinson v. State

280 S.W.3d 786, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 2009 WL 983118
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2009·No. ED 91068·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Robinson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Colleen Dolan presiding, denying Robinson’s motion for post-conviction relief which claimed ineffective assistance of counsel both at trial and on direct appeal. Robinson argues the motion court clearly erred in failing to find his counsel ineffective in three ways: 1) trial counsel failed to object to the variance between the felony information and the verdict directing instruction for armed criminal action; 2) trial counsel failed to call an alibi witness; and 3) appellate counsel failed to raise on appeal an argument that the prosecutor improperly called this case “easy” during closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 280 S.W.3d 786, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 2009 WL 983118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 786 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC v. Hill
280 S.W.3d 786 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)