Robinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Robinson v. State

348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2011 WL 4357824

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2011

DocketNo. ED 95787

StatusPublished

This text of 348 S.W.3d 134 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2011 WL 4357824 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith T. Robinson appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s [135]*135findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith T. Robinson appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s [135]*135findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2011 WL 4357824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-moctapp-2011.